<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US Olympic web site launched on SharePoint 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sharepointsharon.com/2010/02/us-olympic-web-site-launched-on-sharepoint-2010-beta-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sharepointsharon.com/2010/02/us-olympic-web-site-launched-on-sharepoint-2010-beta-2/</link>
	<description>news and tips about SharePoint and friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:35:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joining Dots</title>
		<link>http://www.sharepointsharon.com/2010/02/us-olympic-web-site-launched-on-sharepoint-2010-beta-2/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Joining Dots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharepointsharon.com/2010/02/us-olympic-web-site-launched-on-sharepoint-2010-beta-2/#comment-77</guid>
		<description>Yes, it&#039;s the same debate whether the site uses Flash or Silverlight. Will be interesting to watch how the HTML 5 standard develops and what the future is for embedded media content. It&#039;s never ideal when someone has to first download a control before they can view content on a web site. And the legal wigs start to get involved if the browsers integrate the add-ons to save you the hassle...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it&#39;s the same debate whether the site uses Flash or Silverlight. Will be interesting to watch how the HTML 5 standard develops and what the future is for embedded media content. It&#39;s never ideal when someone has to first download a control before they can view content on a web site. And the legal wigs start to get involved if the browsers integrate the add-ons to save you the hassle&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.sharepointsharon.com/2010/02/us-olympic-web-site-launched-on-sharepoint-2010-beta-2/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharepointsharon.com/2010/02/us-olympic-web-site-launched-on-sharepoint-2010-beta-2/#comment-76</guid>
		<description>It may be easier to make SP2010 to not look like a vanilla Sharepoint site, but there&#039;s a much bigger problem I see with this particular instance of it: half of the web would see &quot;blue lego cubes&quot; all over the page. http://twitpic.com/117ckv&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If your answer to that is &quot;install SilverLight, you boor&quot;, my answer is Never. There is enough of a privacy, CPU-killing and in-your-face advertising with Flash as it is, and Silverlight is no better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may be easier to make SP2010 to not look like a vanilla Sharepoint site, but there&#39;s a much bigger problem I see with this particular instance of it: half of the web would see &quot;blue lego cubes&quot; all over the page. <a href="http://twitpic.com/117ckv" rel="nofollow">http://twitpic.com/117ckv</a></p>
<p>If your answer to that is &quot;install SilverLight, you boor&quot;, my answer is Never. There is enough of a privacy, CPU-killing and in-your-face advertising with Flash as it is, and Silverlight is no better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

